Hidden bacteria diagnosis and treatment of mycoplasma
Introduction
Dear Colleges,
my name is Ron Havenaar, living in the south of Holland near Eindhoven, where I have my practice. I work with the BICOM since 2009 when my sister got breast cancer. At that time I got my degree in Natural Science at the Open University Netherlands, with a section of interest in Nutrition and Toxicology. Because I studied also acupuncture and electro-acupuncture since the 1980’s I decided to buy an electro-acupuncture machine to help my sister. Not knowing what machine to buy I went to several introduction meetings and eventually got notice of the BICOM. One of the visitors said to me that he was an acupuncturist and was there to pick up his third BICOM® machine, because of the immense effectiveness of the treatments with that device. Every few years he had to organize an extra treatment room. So I did not hesitate any longer and immediately ordered a secondhand BICOM 2000 inclusive BICOMBICOMmultisoft® Pilot. A few years later I ordered my new BICOM BICOM optima®.
What then happened was unbelievable for us. My sister and I went together to the oncologist after her second operation and he said to her to put a nylon stocking on her arm because he needed to remove all her lymph glands from her armpit. She would develop (according to him) lymph edema in her arm. Earlier that week I got my first BICOM delivered, so I took my sister to our home and started with all the programs for scars, lymph stimulation, thymus and vitality listed in the handbook. That was all the information I got at that time. Later I followed all the seminars that were available. At the return visit 2 months later in the hospital her oncologist stared at her arm and asked her: “Did I remove all you glands in your armpit?” “Yes, you did.” “Did I tell you that you should develop edema in your arm?” “Yes, you did tell me so.” “Strange … this is the first time to see that someone did not get a swollen arm.” I punched her in the side and said to my sister: “Don’t tell him, he won’t believe it.” After her double OP she got 6 month of chemo and 35 radiation sessions in 5 weeks in the hospital. We agreed, because at that moment I had absolutely no experience with the results of the BICOM.
After the course for BICOMBICOMmultisoft® Pilot and the EAV testing method (still the only method I practice) we could confirm the diagnose of the hospital: Mamma CA intraductal (intrakanikular). I did use the combination Prog. Thymus 428, Ai, amp. 18x, together with Multisoft Mamma CA in channel 1. After 5 minutes of treatment she suddenly cried and said: „I got an electrical shock from my left breast to my hand.” Since that moment I never have been able to test Mamma CA again. Because of the chemo therapy she was completely out of energy, lost all her hair and became deeply depressed. She felt nearly dead. But after three months of weekly therapy with the BICOM she was able to do her work again for 50 % and after 6 months regained normal strength. After 5 years of hospital medication she was declared 100 pct clean. I see her every 3 months for a test, but she still is in a good condition. We feel that this is also a great hurray for the BICOM.
Because of these results she started to tell others of her situation and several other cancer patients started to ask my help. A few weeks later few new patients stood before our door. Since than I have a growing practice.
But today I would like to introduce to you the diagnosis and treatment of Stealth Pathogens and especially the Mycoplasmas. The problem with a Stealth Pathogen is: it is nearly invisible, creates no sudden troubles, infection may have happened many years ago, doctors or hospitals nearly never find a diagnosis, anti-biotics have normally no or weak effect, but on the long run are very stubborn against eradication and create chronic conditions.
Types of Pathogens
We can divide pathogens in strong virulent and low virulent. Virulence determines a pathogen’s ability to infect and cause disease.
Strong virulent Pathogens
The most virulent pathogens take an aggressive break-down-and-destroy approach, taking the resources they need and causing significant harm in the body. They are uninvited and must pass through the barriers of the immune system to get what they need. Virulent pathogens are easily identified by the diseases they cause. They can be lethal, but their virulence is often their Achilles’ heel, because they are easily detected.
Because they are so active, modern science has had significant success in defining them and creating tools that work against them — modern sanitation, antibiotics, and vaccines have dramatically reduced the threat of the most virulent microbes. That said, high-virulence microbes are not the ones we worry about with chronic conditions.
Low virulent Pathogens (Stealth Pathogens)
Just possibly the most successful microbes are not the most virulent. Success in the microbe world is defined by the ability to propagate and flourish. Killing or severely disabling the host can be counterproductive. A stealth approach offers great advantage. Persistent warfare is how they win.
Nearly everyone on the planet is exposed to low-virulence pathogens, almost daily. Many of those pathogens never gain access beyond the initial barriers of the immune system and are hardly noticed. Unfortunately some get access to deeper tissues and a trenches war starts between the microbe and the host’s immune system until the microbe is disposed of properly. A common example of this is how a mycoplasma bypasses the immune system and contributes to fibromyalgia.
During an acute infection with one of these pathogens, the degree and nature of symptoms depends on the type of microbe, the site of initial infection, and the reaction of the immune system to the microbe. Be aware that totally different low-virulence pathogens tend to work together, by example mycoplasmas and fungi.
Under certain circumstances like pH, lack of nutrients, chemicals, antibiotics, most bacteria can change or even lose their cell wall. They can become dormant by the excretion of filterable particles that are resistant to heat (>300 degrees Celsius), chemicals or lack of water. The size of these filterable particles can be 0.1 p.m to 0.01 pm. At the time of the early.
The best book I ever found on the market on this topic was the book of Lida H. Mattman: „Stealth Pathogens — Cell Wall Deficient Forms’. It contains a collection of papers on historic research and of her own research to explain the pleomorphic nature of nearly all bacteria known.
research, around 100 years ago, the only way to discriminate between a virus or a bacterium was the size of the particle. In the laboratories they developed ceramic filters with a known size of the pores, like 0.2 p.m. When particles passed through these filters they said ‘it is a virus’. These filterable particles are so small that they can pass also easily through the pores of human cells.
Stealth pathogens can be seen in many different forms: bacterial forms, budding, filterable particles, fungi-like forms or even can form conglomerates of hybrid combinations of different species. They gave them names like L-forms, CWD (cell wall deficient bacteria), pleomorphic bacteria, and others.
In this drawing from the book of Lida Mattman we can see the different options that bacteria have to display themselves in totally different shapes, depending on the culture medium. The same bacterium can look like coccoid, rod shaped, virus particles, budding, fungi-like or any other shape. The following drawing illustrates the route that a bacterium can follow to different forms. The result is confusing and makes determination difficult.
Figure 1— Route Differentiation Options of stealth bacteria, Lida Mattman
The effect from all these different shapes is that many diseases escape from diagnosis. Bacteria can change or lose their cell wall, go intracellular in host cells and hide themselves from the immune system. Fluids like blood, that were always believed to be sterile, on the contrary is always infected by nature. That has health implications, for example with respect to blood transfusions.
What are Mycoplasmas?
Mycoplasmas are a mollicute (= soft skin) genus of bacteria that lack a cell wall around their cell membranes. That means that they are already pleomorphic or CWD by nature. They can be parasitic (intracellular infection) or saprotrophic (eating decomposing materials from dead cells). This characteristic, makes them naturally resistant to many common antibiotics such as penicillin or other beta-lactam antibiotics that target cell wall synthesis. Macrolides, such as erythromycin, clarithromycin and azithromycin, are the treatment of choice against for example M. pneumoniae infections. Tetracyclines have been effective against both Mycoplasma hominis and Ureaplasma urealyticum, but resistance is increasing.
They are difficult to recognize because of the overlapping symptoms!
Approximately 20 % of infected persons have no symptoms!
Nearly everybody is infected!
Mycoplasma can be a co-infection of a sexually transmitted disease.
Mycoplasma is often seen after insect bites like ticks as a co-infection.
Mycoplasma can be a contaminant of commercial vaccinations.
Mycoplasma can infiltrate cell cultures, including malignant HeLa cells.’
Mycoplasma species are the smallest bacterial cells yet discovered, they can survive without oxygen, and come in various shapes. This makes mycoplasma extremely difficult to find. Therefore they belong to the “stealth pathogens”. Several species are pathogenic in humans, such as M. pneumoniae, which is an important cause of atypical pneumonia, and M. genitalium, which is involved in pelvic inflammatory diseases.
Which organ can be infected?
pneumoniae is a known cause of respiratory tract infections. However, it can also infect organs other than lungs such as the nervous system, joints, skin, kidneys, heart, muscles, eyes and blood. These infections can be seen before, during, or after lung disease or can occur without respiratory illness. That makes it difficult to recognize when testing a patient.
hominis, M. genitalium and U. urealyticum, commonly found in the kidneys, urinary and genital tracts, have also been proven to cause human disease. M. hominis and U. urealyticum have also been associated with pneumonia and respiratory distress syndrome in newborns. They can be a cause of infertility in adults.
Diseases that can be caused by common Mycoplasmas
Mycoplasma pneumoniae can cause a sore throat, pneumonia, and the inflammation of the lungs and bronchi. The atypical nature of the bacterium contribute to the development of atypical pneumonia. A pneumonia infection more often affects people between 5 and 40 years old, outbreaks are more common in crowded places. M. pneumoniae is transmitted from person-to-person by infected respiratory droplets during close contact. The signs and symptoms of mycoplasma pneumonia infection vary according to the stage of illness. Usually, there are flu-like symptoms such as sore throat, fever, headache, weakness, chills and cough. Less common, patients may face ear pain, eye pain, joint stiffness, muscles aches, and skin rash. M. pneumoniae can also be a cause of severe infections in other areas as central nervous system, liver and the pancreas.
Mycoplasma genitalium is linked to infections of the urethra, especially when other bacteria did damage the urethra before or when the immune system is weak.
Mycoplasma homini and Ureaplasma urealyticum are known as genital mycoplasmas and can come as co-infection with other sexually transmitted diseases (STDs). These species can lead to urethritis and vaginitis in women. In a later stage they can promote anemia. Ureaplasma urealyticum is a mycoplasma that lives on urea and is often located in the genital tract of women. It can contribute to premature birth if she is pregnant and can be transmitted from mother to child. And as a result, an infant may be affected by pneumonia, infection of central nervous system, and lung malfunction.
My first wakeup call
In winter 2015 — 2016 I noticed that a lot of clients came in with a common cough. Not to worry a lot about it, so I believed. But that winter I noticed that at least 60 — 70 % of all people with lung complaints tested positive on M. pneumonia, many of them together with a virus or streptococcus. Until one of the patients said that he believed to know the source. He lives near a military airport and often sees planes with a strange cloud behind them. He told me to look on the internet about “chemtrails”. I am not a follower of all that conspiracy theories, but I have to admit that when someone would like to develop a biological weapon with stealth properties; Mycoplasma is the type he is looking for. If an airplane sprays something in the air and a lot of people die tomorrow: Everybody will try to find the cause and bring the person to justice. But if you got the bug 20 years ago and the symptoms are so different in everyone: no scientist can prove the statistical relationship, so nobody is to be pointed responsible.
In 80 % of the Gulf War Illness patients, who were positive for blood mycoplasma infections had only one type of Mycoplasma, in particular M. fermentans, possibly a contaminant of vaccination. In healthy control subjects the incidence of mycoplasma infection was -‘8.5 % and none were found to have multiple mycoplasma species. In 107 family members of mycoplasma-positive Gulf War illness patients there were 57 patients (53 %) that had essentially the same signs and symptoms as the veterans.
My first strange case
A colleague, BICOM therapist, told me that one of his patients was covered with skin rash problems that nobody could find the cause of, but was in a terrible condition. He asked for a visit in my practice together with that patient and then do the test together; he would like to test with the tensor, but I only do testing with EAV. Of course I agreed. So he came with his patient, a man around 35 years old. The man said that he was a medical doctor himself but could not work already for 2 years, because he was too ill. His friend had to take over his practice. The problem was a severe skin rash with a nasty itch. He could not sleep anymore, because he was scratching his skin all night and day. It made him completely mad. He showed me the skin problem that looked like psoriasis from head to feet, on every spot on his body. Strange enough he had already been in a medical research in the AMC, the academic hospital in Amsterdam. They did run all the tests they had in the hospital in the past two years: MRI scans, x-ray, blood tests, urine tests, but no diagnosis was found. That made him desperate.
With the BBC we found within 5 minutes a severe infection with M. homini and U. urealyticum in both his kidneys, his bladder and prostate. Black blocks with [6] everywhere in the graphic.
After seeing this result we decided to try to double-check with the BICOM BICOM optima® and the EAV test. This seemed to be negative. That was a deception. So we decided to first run a zapper with 3.6 Hz on him (5 minutes), drink a cup of herbal tea and then the BICOM BICOM optima® program “intracellular infections” (8 minutes) which is also 6 Hz. From that moment on he showed a response on M. pneumonia and U. urealyticum beyond any doubt. Both the tensor test and the EAV test now were positive. Conclusion: mycoplasmas are really ‘stealthy pathogens’ and need a strong pulse to unmask them.
After the BICOM EAV check we became curious to do the third test. I suggested taking a few fresh blood samples for a checkup under the microscope. Mycoplasma under a darkfield microscope is probably seen as small “fried eggs”. So we did, and within a few minutes we saw them dancing before our eyes. The mouth of the patient did fall wide open, because he could not believe his eyes.
Treatment:
We did run Program 428 Thymus, Ai, amplification 18x, frequency 91 kHz, time
10 minutes, which is a strong defense booster. With BICOMmu[tisoft we connected U. urealyticum in Ch.1 and from the internal substances ‘Immunity Boost’ in Ch.2. We checked again and found that individualization to 94 kHz and adjusting the amplification factor during the treatment gave good results. Additionally we did run programs like kidney stimulation, liver stimulation, urine bladder infections and skin programs. After one hour he stepped down from the chair and said that the itching was gone. Finally I gave him 30 minutes with a mycoplasma program on a phanotron (plasma lamp), which runs radio frequencies.
I am not always prescribing supplements, but very effective in a case like this is the combination of Cats Claw (Uncaria tomentosa, anti-parasitic) and Cystone (Ayurveda kidney detox formula). The patient was further treated for 3 months with the BICOM BICOM optima® in the practice of the colleague that first brought him in and finally he fully recovered. He returned to his own doctor’s practice again and went to work as normal.
My second strange case
A lady of around 50 years, husband and 2 children, came to me for treatment of pain in the right arm. BICOM programs were effective for a few days, but pain kept returning. Situation became worse. She put her arm in an arm sling. When she tried to reposition her arm in the bandage, here arm broke. When brought to the hospital, the cause was found to be Multiple Myeloma (aka: Kahler disease). I never had heard of the illness before. M. Myeloma is a form of bone cancer that produces leucocytes with aggressive proteins that destroys bone tissue. Her upper arm bone was already reduced to pencil thin. They removed by surgery the infected bone tissue and replaced it with a metal prosthesis.
The oncologist treatment started with Lenalidomide (trade name Revlimid), which is a chemo therapy with pills. She had no energy anymore and lived for nearly half a year in the home of her mother (83) in a bed in the living room. After one year she was that sick from the side-effects that she asked her doctor to stop the therapy. OK, he said, we do a blood test now, give you 3 months off and redo the blood test after that period. When CA markers go up again we will restart therapy, when it stays stable we do nothing.
I asked her to save her last chemo pill for me, to put it into the input cup on the BICOM. Returning to my practice she asked to lookup the previous BBC checks, to see if there was something remarkable in older scans. The only thing I could find was hemoglobin and gamma-globulin deviations in the blood section. I checked “Dr. Google” to display the markers of MM. I got the following:
I found in the BBC scan in the blood analysis marked in red: gamma-globulin = +3, so in older scans this was already present but unfortunately I was unaware of the meaning. A decrease in haptoglobin could support a diagnosis of hemolytic anemia, especially when correlated with a decreased red blood cell count.
Figure 3 — BBC bone marrow tissue testing point, seen on the breast bone in the diaphragm screen
When zooming in with the BBC on the bone marrow I saw scores like 4 on many of her bones, but without any relationship with a known disease. I also looked in the archive of Multisoft, but there is no Multiple Myeloma (or Kahler) digital sample onboard. So I had no chance of finding the diagnosis based on the EAV tests. MM is relatively unknown, but is seen as a rising form of cancer. I found on the web:
Since the early 1990s, myeloma incidence rates have increased by around a third (32 %) in the UK. Rates in males have increased by more than a third (35 %) and rates in females have increased by more than a fifth (22 %).
Conclusion: I felt sorry, but it is no shame to have missed this diagnosis in an early state, because even her GP admitted that MM is fairly uncommon.
Treatment Plan:
BBC: First zoom in on breast bone, there we will find the link to blood cells and stem cells. I treated the blood cells on nearly all bones that show scores of 3 and higher: shoulders, arms, hips and legs. In the output cup we can export BBC scan frequencies with the reprinter option to water. The treated glass of water is placed in the input cup of the BICOM and let it drink afterwards. I noticed that all her bones went down from score 4 back to score 3, in a time span of 6 months. Some bones points even already returned to score 2.
BICOM: Channel 1: Program 428, flex on the sternum, with M. pneumonia and urealyticum in the input cup, Channel 2 (Internal Substances) Immunity boost. Basic Programs that tested positive together with Lenalidomide (her last pill) together with Curcumin capsules. Prepare a chip with the BICOM chip module:
program Substance — to Substance: Input cup: The BBC treated water, Lenalidomide pill and Curcumin capsule. Place the chip on sternum. This method simulates a virtual chemo treatment but at the same time we harmonize the body.
BICOM: Program: Improving Blood Values: 310 and 311, Flex on collar bones, at least covering both acupuncture points Kidney 27. Input cup: Ch1: blood sample, Ch2. Circulation Vitamins from internal substances, Curcumin capsules or vitamin
I found a patient forum on the web writing that: Lenalidomide plus Curcumin combination is more effective than Lenalidomide only. So I prescribed the Curcumin caps with the strongest concentration of curcuma with black pepper. She uses them additionally. The effect with the BICOM virtual chemo combi treatment is: side-effects are slightly noticeable, but very much tolerable. When side-effects are coming up: Normal Basic and Harmonisation programs and programs for Vitality help her to suppress the tiredness.
Every six to eight weeks I also mix the BICOMBICOMmultisoft® Pilot substance Erypo (EPO, or Erythropoetine) in Step 3 and upload it in the chip module to improve red blood cell production. Sometimes I put the red cable in a bottle of tap water, start Substance to Substance, and give it to her to drink every few hours a small cup.
When checking her blood sample under the darkfield microscope I saw a lot of mycoplasmas after the BICOM session, more than before the session. My preliminary conclusion: May be her bone tissue is infiltrated with mycoplasma, while treatment made leave intracellular pathogens from cells after the correct frequency is exposed.
After the first period of 3 months the hospital was happy with the stabilization of the CA markers. They did not go up. So she got another chemo-free period. After the second 3 months period her oncologist was amazed to see that her CA markers were below measurable (<2)!. After the third 3 months period (9 months) again her markers were below measurable, plus the CT scan showed no special activity in the bones except for some spots on the skull.
When looking with the BBC on other bones than the breast bone we will find measuring points on the arms and legs with problematic scores. But after 9 months of treatment we definitely saw the improvement on the BBC. In this case the improvements of the bone scans were in parallel agreement of the hospital scans and blood tests of the laboratories.
Normally I set extra points in the image to see if there is a hot spot somewhere that should be treated more intensively. Therefor the images do not have the same number of points but we can see the progression of healing inside the bone. For me this is an unbelievable result not only for the patient but also with respect to the technology of the BBC scans. The CT scans in the hospital were commented by the oncologist as „good, it seems to be quiet, but it can come back in a few years”.
When we see the following images, it is obvious that she is not yet 100 % healed, but we are on the right track with our method of treatments.
Figure 4 — bone marrow points legs first session, next picture after 9 months
Figure 5 — bone marrow points upper arms first session, next picture after 9 months
The possible cause of Multiple Myeloma
Possible cause of MM: On 6 February 2014, The Scripps Research Institute announced the discovery of a novel protein, which they named Protein M, from the M. genitalium cell membrane. Scientists identified the protein during investigations on the origin of multiple myeloma.
A lot of people suffer from mycoplasma in the prostate or uterus. I have seen it in many of the scans with the BBC. Amazing enough also some other forms of anemia with comparable defects like MM seem to go together with mycoplasma: like aplastic anemia or hemolytic anemia. On the internet I found a lot of information that links Mycoplasma to anemia and several bone marrow diseases. A few samples:
Mycoplasma pneumonia Infection: A Possible Trigger for Immune Thrombocytopenia
Isolation of Mycoplasma From Leukemic Bone Marrow and Blood by Direct Culturem
Severe Hemolytic Anemia Associated with Mild Pneumonia Caused by Mycoplasma pneumonia°
Ultrastructure of a mycoplasma recovered from the bone marrow in systemic Lupus erythematosus.
What is to be said about the origin of blood in the view of the Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM)?
Blood mainly originates from food essence and Jing (the essence of life associated with the growth and development of the body). First, digested food is turned into food essence by the stomach and spleen’s transforming functions. It is then transported upwards by the spleen to the lungs where it turns into blood with the help of the heart and lungs. Eating a balanced and healthy diet is extremely important, because of the spleen’s role in the production of qi and blood.
A second source of blood comes from Jing, which is stored in the kidneys. Jing travels to the bones where it turns into healthy and strong marrow. The marrow in turn produces the blood. Jing also goes to the liver to be transformed into clear blood.
Conclusion according TCM: if the kidneys are infected (includes also urine bladder, prostate or uterus) the bone marrow can be damaged. Also in Western medicine some researchers found the link between bone marrow defects and Mycoplasma.
Diagnosis
The BICOM BodyCheck (BBC)
Urogenital Mycoplasma in male patients
Mycoplasma in male patients is very often found: Mycoplasma homini and/or Ureaplasma urealyticum is seen in the prostate and/or urine bladder and/or kidneys. The most common clinical manifestation of M. spp. infection in men is that of acute or chronic urethritis, prostatitis, pelvic pain, low quality of semen and infertility. Common allopathic medicines in use are Erythromycin and Azithromycin. Resistance against Azithromycin is coming up and in such cases moxifloxacin has been helpful. Normal anti-biotics are ineffective. Growing resistance to azithromycin and moxifloxacin is being reported for Mycoplasma genitalium in the Asia-Pacific region.
Mycoplasma in the urogenital region can be a co-infection and left-over after the treatment of Chlannydia trachomatis or Neisseria gonorrhoeae. The gonococcal urethritis is treated with antibiotics, but is ineffective against Mycoplasma.’ Meaning: the mycoplasma stays intact after standard STD treatment.
Figure 6 — Source: Clinical Infectious Diseases, Volume 35, Issue 10, 15 November 2002
Using the BBC is extremely simple. Put the headphones on and start a manual scan or automatic scan. Normally every 8 weeks I start a next full automatic scan. It happens often that in the past weeks patients pickup a new virus or bacterium. If we only would do a rescan on organs that were treated last time, we would have a lot of missing information.
Figure 7 — BBC scan of the male urogenital region
In this case I found Mycoplasma in the prostate only. When we see a score of 5 or 6 we can draw a line around the bad score point (5) and create a spot measurement. Then we can click on the results:
Figure 8 — BBC scan of the pathogens inside the prostate
Explanation of the numbers: The numbers in the display are compared with the optimum distribution, which in this case is 1.687. The optimum distribution is made with a calculation against frequency and concentration. The deviation is the distance related to the mean (vertical line in the middle). The lower the deviation counter, the higher the probability of the conclusion. Here we find Ureaplasma urealyticum at 0.041 on the list in BOLD BLACK font, which is a top hit. Somewhat lower in gradation, but score still smaller than 1.687 we see: Mycoplasma homini at 1.319. Mycoplasma homini would thus be a next candidate, but the probability calculation of the frequency or concentration is lower.
Figure 9 — Probability distribution of possible pathogens
A lot of men suffer from prostatitis, high levels of prostate specific antigen (PSA) which is seen as a marker for prostate CA. This could be related to a chronic low grade infect level of mycoplasma as published on the following links.
Association of Mycoplasma hominis infection with prostate cancer
Detection of infectious organisms in archival prostate cancer tissues
The Prevalence of Ureaplasma Urealyticum and Mycoplasma Genitalium in Patients with Prostate Cancer in Shohada Hospital in Tehran, Iran’
Mycoplasma Genitalium: the prevalent, highly drug-resistant new STD nobody is testing for
When the patient claims to have urinating problems or was in hospital for a checkup I will normally do a double check with BICOMBICOMmultisoft® Pilot to be 100 % accurate in the diagnosis. A 3rd check can be done with a b