Tips and tricks around the BICOM BodyCheck2

Norbert Lindner, naturopathic practitioner, Zeuthen, Germany

Dear Colleagues,

it is my pleasure to share with you today a few tips and tricks about BBC 2, which will provide you with an interesting way of obtaining a comprehensive analysis from your patient with just a few clicks.

However, I don’t want to give too much away just yet. First, we need a little theoretical knowledge to understand the BBC2 and the applications I intend to show you today.

As you know, the BBC2’s operation is purely energy-based. This means that all measurements are performed on an energy basis and cannot be equated to or compared with medical diagnostics. The BBC2 transmits frequencies by means of a coil in the headphones (the one on the right). These are then received again in a second coil in the headphone on the left (the side with the cable).

We are familiar with the medical approach of analysing something from the body. We collect and analyse, we screen and evaluate. The BBC2 does not measure, analyse or evaluate a single human structure. It is our bioenergetic field that feeds into the BBC2 analysis.

The human organism, or its bioenergetic field, serves purely to deflect the transmitted frequencies through the headphones. The frequencies received are then compared with reference frequencies in the database and evaluated using a probability calculation, the Gaussian distribution curve, and converted into a ratio (the coefficients).

The BBC2 evaluates 3853 individual frequencies (etalons) with the measured vibrations and shows us where the greatest imbalance is. Put simply, the system shows us which structure has the greatest energy requirement or which load represents the greatest energy drain. It therefore shows where the greatest weakness is in the organism and where it needs to be energetically stabilised or built up. It is possible for a person not to feel that this area is stressed or ill, because the body manages to keep it stable, i.e. compensates for the imbalance.

The BBC is not intended to confirm an already known diagnosis of the patient, because the location of the event does not necessarily have to be the cause. Once again, the system always points me to the area of greatest imbalance. If I stabilise this, I can assist my patient where they need it most at the moment of the measurement.

I would now like to offer an observation that should be understood as the basis for the BBC2 analysis that follows.

When I diagnose a stomach, I also get the physiologies and pathologies present in the stomach, obviously. If I diagnose the whole person, I get all the information about them and not just their stomach. If I base my diagnosis on a drop of blood, I also receive all the information via the blood drop, or I can use bioresonance therapy to gather all the information about a person.

Each of the 100 trillion cells of a human being always contains all the information about the current state of that person. It doesn’t matter whether I take the drop of blood for analysis from the ear, the finger or a vein.

Let’s move on to the BBC2. If I select a sectional view of the stomach or any other sectional view, all 3853 etalons are always evaluated in the background. To give a few numbers, there are e.g. 652 pathologies, 144 microorganisms and 410 physiological tissue frequencies.

One major difference to the BBC1 is that all etalons stored in the BBC1 are always evaluated, but only the etalons belonging to the stomach are displayed. This means that gastritis is indicated but not, for example, cystitis. With the BBC2, I am shown all the information of the entire organism (through the 3853 etalons) in all the sectional views. So, when I look at the stomach, I my given a view of the whole organism starting from the stomach.

Take the thyroid gland. Following the scan, I am given a calculation of all etalons as seen from the thyroid gland. The organism looks different from the thyroid gland than from the stomach. It may be that a bone has the greatest load or that acne, for example, is indicated, which of course does not occur in the thyroid gland. But from the sectional view of the thyroid gland, i.e. from the perspective of the thyroid gland, acne is the greatest weakness in the organism.

Just picture two lighthouses on an island. Each lighthouse illuminates the same island. However, the island looks different from lighthouse 1 than from lighthouse 2. It is the same with the sectional views in the BBC2. I illuminate the whole body from a particular perspective (a sectional view) and analyse the imbalances.

In the evaluation we are familiar with, all etalons are calculated on each sectional view, then added together with all other measured sectional views and evaluated. The frequency of a load in relation to the number of etalons and in relation to the number of occurrences in the measured sectional views determine their significance in the evaluation.

Clearly, the more sectional views I include in the evaluation, i.e. the more lighthouses that illuminate the island, the richer the measured data and the more accurate the evaluation.

Now the question. What happens if I only measure one sectional view and evaluate this one sectional view?

Case study 1

A patient comes for analysis with chronic intestinal complaints and I only scan the intestinal sectional view and the corresponding mucous membrane. This means I look at the organism from the intestine and see which area, from this perspective, has the greatest energetic weakness and needs to be stabilised.

Let’s take a look at the results.

The small intestine wall shows the greatest stress with 6 entropy points, followed by the large intestine wall with 5 entropy points.

All etalons (3853) on each individual sectional view are now calculated and summarised in the evaluation. This is the result we get.

The biggest energy imbalance is in the group of energetic dysbalances, the immunological dysbalances, which we will examine in more detail.

As you can see, from the perspective of the intestine, radiculitis shows up as the greatest weakness. In other words, my patient’s intestines say that the irritated or damaged nerve roots of the back are the greatest weakness for them and require stabilisation. So if I wish to treat my patient’s intestine, I have to include radiculitis in the treatment plan. Furthermore, it is recommended to take a look at tonsillitis and polyarthritis.

Case study 2

Let’s stay with the digestive system. A patient with stomach discomfort is scanned in the same way and we obtain the following picture.

The posterior wall of the stomach and the gastric glands are stressed. The gastric glands with 6 entropy points show a greater imbalance than the posterior wall of the stomach with 5 entropy points.

Let’s take a look at the evaluation.

Again, the greatest energy imbalance in this patient is found in the group of energetic dysbalances, in the immunological dysbalances.

However, the “immunological imbalances” category shows a different picture. The greatest imbalance is the stomach itself.

The greatest focus in the treatment of stomach complaints is therefore on the stomach itself.

You can see that if we look at just one sectional view, we get an important clue to the greatest imbalance. I often run a more extensive scan after this evaluation to cover “all the lighthouses” and obtain a broader overview. Once again, the most important area to stabilise is the view from the perspective of the single sectional view.

Of course, I then test the appropriate therapy programs for treatment and stabilisation with bioresonance therapy as usual.

Let’s go one step further.

Question, what information am I given if I only use the “general male or female” sectional view?

If we only scan this sectional view, the evaluation will show the greatest stresses for my entire body. And this will be sorted according to priority.

Here is an example, male patient, 51 years old

In the “areas”, the healthy vibrations (tissue frequencies), the intestine indicates a burden wirh a value of 30 and in the energy imbalances, the pathologies, the immunological dysbalances show up with a load of 45.

Stabilisation of the tissue is more important at 30 than a pathological load of 45.

Therapyprograms for strengthening (therapy type A) the intestine are to be preferred to therapy for stress AI. Therapy programs for AI load. Nevertheless, the stomach also requires treatment, and avoiding cow’s milk will support the treatment.

Of course, I look at all the results of the evaluation and not just those with the smallest value, but I can see at a glance where I need to focus with my patient.

I have just tested 3853 individual ampoules on my patient in less than 2 minutes and sorted them according to priority. You may well ask whether the patient experiences discomfort here or not? That is not the priority for me using this method.

The most important thing for me is that I now know where most of the energy is lost from my patient’s energetic system and if I can halt this loss of energy, my patient will have more strength available to heal his symptoms.

Is this a good start to successful bioresonance therapy? Decide for yourselves. For me, this is the most efficient basic therapy I can give my patient at the time of the scan.

Thank you for your attention and I hope you enjoy trying it out and have a lot of success.